<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3D TV: Bust or Boom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/3d-tv-bust-or-boom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/3d-tv-bust-or-boom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack Michaels Maverick Money Makers</title>
		<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/3d-tv-bust-or-boom/comment-page-1/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack Michaels Maverick Money Makers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 01:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.watch.tv/?p=1257#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the 3dtv will catch on, its over priced and it came out way before it should have. The high definition craze hasn&#039;t even been fully implemented and now companies want us to buy these tv&#039;s and even high priced glasses to go along with it. It will be a flop in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the 3dtv will catch on, its over priced and it came out way before it should have. The high definition craze hasn&#8217;t even been fully implemented and now companies want us to buy these tv&#8217;s and even high priced glasses to go along with it. It will be a flop in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JuannyCinco</title>
		<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/3d-tv-bust-or-boom/comment-page-1/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>JuannyCinco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.watch.tv/?p=1257#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>I read that 3d TV has depth INTO the screen and not OUT of the screen.  It&#039;s also not true &quot;depth&quot; but layered two dimensional.

Overall the review seem to be.  &quot;OK&quot;.  &quot;OK&quot; does not sell a technology to me.  I remember my dad telling me that he had seen HD in Japan back before it hit the market place and he was &quot;wowed&quot; by it.

Seems this is a ho hum technology.

The glasses aren&#039;t holding it back. The problem is that auto-stereoscopic TVs have such a narrow view angle.  That and this 3d is not 3d - it doesn&#039;t have a true depth feel. 

Holographic TV without glasses.  That would impress me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that 3d TV has depth INTO the screen and not OUT of the screen.  It&#8217;s also not true &#8220;depth&#8221; but layered two dimensional.</p>
<p>Overall the review seem to be.  &#8220;OK&#8221;.  &#8220;OK&#8221; does not sell a technology to me.  I remember my dad telling me that he had seen HD in Japan back before it hit the market place and he was &#8220;wowed&#8221; by it.</p>
<p>Seems this is a ho hum technology.</p>
<p>The glasses aren&#8217;t holding it back. The problem is that auto-stereoscopic TVs have such a narrow view angle.  That and this 3d is not 3d &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t have a true depth feel. </p>
<p>Holographic TV without glasses.  That would impress me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

