<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Watch.tv Blog &#187; compulsions.tv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.watch.tv/tag/compulsions-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.watch.tv</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Cutting-edge TV&#8221; found on .tv</title>
		<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/cutting-edge-tv-found-on-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/cutting-edge-tv-found-on-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom C., Verisign</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.tv News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compulsions.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easytoassemble.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.watch.tv/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a great article in this Sunday&#8217;s Washington Post Arts &#38; Style section entitled &#8220;Cutting-edge TV? It&#8217;s not on cable.&#8221; The article talks about how online video continues to grow into longer, more engaging, higher-quality shows. It also highlights some of the relative merits of creating an online show, like the ability to be more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a great <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/15/AR2010041506083.html" target="_blank">article</a> in this Sunday&#8217;s Washington Post Arts &amp; Style section entitled &#8220;Cutting-edge TV? It&#8217;s not on cable.&#8221; The article talks about how online video continues to grow into longer, more engaging, higher-quality shows. It also highlights some of the relative merits of creating an online show, like the ability to be more topical or more niche than traditional television. I read these types of articles because I follow activity in the online video space, and I truly enjoy the ones that showcase new or unique content. This article is great because it lists 9 great web shows and their concepts, but the really fantastic part is that the top two shows are .tv sites!</p>
<p>The first show is called EasytoAssemble.tv and stars Illeana Douglas and Justine Bateman (you may remember Bateman from the 80&#8242;s sitcom &#8220;Family Ties&#8221;) as out of work actors who get jobs at Ikea.  I&#8217;d recommend skipping the pilot and going right into the first show &#8211; overall, the series has sort of a &#8220;Curb your Enthusiasm&#8221; vibe.</p>
<p>The second show is called Compulsions.tv &#8211; this one is similar to Showtime&#8217;s &#8220;Dexter&#8221;, but in my personal opinion much better. I watched the first episode of Dexter when it was first aired, and it failed to do in 60 minutes what Compulsions.tv did in 5 minutes &#8211; grab my interest.</p>
<p>Check out the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2010/04/16/GR2010041602123.html">full list</a>, and maybe you&#8217;ll discover a new favorite show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/cutting-edge-tv-found-on-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

