<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Watch.tv Blog &#187; comscore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.watch.tv/tag/comscore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.watch.tv</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:44:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Video Viewing in the US For February 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/video-viewing-in-the-us-for-february-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/video-viewing-in-the-us-for-february-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michaela B., VeriSign</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Streaming Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comscore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.watch.tv/?p=1235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[comScore&#8217;s US video numbers came out today for February 2010. I took the liberty of digging up February 2009&#8217;s numbers and did a quick comparison between the two. Here are some things I found of interest when looking year over year:

The duration of the average online video rose 23% in a year to 4.3 minutes.
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.comscore.com/">comScore&#8217;s</a> US video numbers came out today <a href="http://bit.ly/czovkd">for February 2010</a>. I took the liberty of digging up February 2009&#8217;s numbers and did a quick comparison between the two. Here are some things I found of interest when looking year over year:</p>
<ul>
<li>The duration of the average online video rose 23% in a year to 4.3 minutes.</li>
<li>The percentage of the US population that watched an video online  rose 7.6 percentage points from 75.5% to 83.1%.</li>
<li>The videos viewed on YouTube grew by 124% to nearly 12B (yes that&#8217;s &#8220;B&#8221; for billions) video&#8217;s a month in the US.</li>
<li>In 2009, Facebook wasn&#8217;t on the top 10 list of properties by Unique Viewers. In February it&#8217;s ranked number 7 with 36MM viewers.</li>
</ul>
<p>One thing that hasn&#8217;t changed in the year though &#8212; for all the growth in video on the web &#8212; it&#8217;s still got a very long tail. In February of 2009 the top 10 properties by videos viewed made up  57.5% of the total videos. In February 2010 that top 10 list  lost 2.3 percentage points to only 55.3%. This leaves lots of room for .tv! Great things to come in the video revolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/video-viewing-in-the-us-for-february-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Vignettes Roundup: February 19</title>
		<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/02/video-vignettes-for-the-week/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/02/video-vignettes-for-the-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michaela B., VeriSign</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.tv News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle and Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adap.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comscore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justin.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man in box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.watch.tv/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adap.tv Announces an Industry First: AdAge has a good write up where they say &#8220;For years, online advertisers have used online ad exchanges to buy display advertising. But now exchanges are also coming to the more complex and fractured world of online video. Adap.tv, a 3-year-old Silicon Valley video ad-serving company, has opened the doors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Adap.tv Announces an Industry First:</strong> <a href="http://bit.ly/bytCPF">AdAge</a> has a good write up where they say &#8220;<em>For years, online advertisers have used online ad exchanges to buy display advertising. But now exchanges are also coming to the more complex and fractured world of online video. Adap.tv, a 3-year-old Silicon Valley video ad-serving company, has opened the doors on the first online video ad exchange, and is expected to announce as much Tuesday </em>[2/16]<em>; Gannet, Demand Media and dozens of local TV stations are trying it out, as well as Publicis Groupe&#8217;s Vivaki and Omnicom Group&#8217;s OMG Digital.</em>&#8221; The article talks about how this near real time system is so revolutionary compared to how regular TV ads are done, months or seasons in advance. Kudos to <a href="http://bit.ly/a7ZShf">Adapt.tv</a>!</p>
<p><strong>Justin.tv Part of Fund Raising in the UK</strong>: UK personality Tim Shaw is live on <a href="http://bit.ly/cexO9N">Justin.tv </a>closed up in a box. He refers to it as <a href="http://bit.ly/c7A2oE">Man in Box</a> and he&#8217;s in there for 30 days unless using Google maps and clues, Brits find him before that. There&#8217;s a prize if you find him, and funds raised will go to <a href="http://bit.ly/dhpWlR">Help for Heros</a> (a UK organization that raises money for wounded soldiers). An interesting cross between reality tv on the web, helping veterans and .tv. Thanks <a href="http://www.justin.tv/">Justin.tv</a>!</p>
<p><object id="live_embed_player_flash" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="376" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="data" value="http://www.justin.tv/widgets/live_embed_player.swf?channel=maninbox" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="flashvars" value="channel=maninbox&amp;auto_play=false&amp;start_volume=25" /><param name="src" value="http://www.justin.tv/widgets/live_embed_player.swf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="live_embed_player_flash" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="376" src="http://www.justin.tv/widgets/live_embed_player.swf" flashvars="channel=maninbox&amp;auto_play=false&amp;start_volume=25" allownetworking="all" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" data="http://www.justin.tv/widgets/live_embed_player.swf?channel=maninbox" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object><a class="trk" style="padding: 2px 0px 4px; display: block; width: 345px; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10px; text-decoration: underline; text-align: center;" href="http://www.justin.tv/maninbox">Watch live video from Man In Box on Justin.tv</a><br />
<strong>Cisco&#8217;s Predictions on Mobile Video</strong>: <a href="http://bit.ly/crulKO">Cisco </a>recently released one of their reports that tries to predict traffic into the future. They had a number of things about video that I thought were interesting:</p>
<ul>
<li>Almost 66 percent of the world&#8217;s mobile data traffic will be video by 2014.</li>
<li>Mobile video will grow at a CAGR of 131 percent between 2009 and 2014.</li>
<li>Mobile video has the highest growth rate of any application category measured within the Cisco VNI Forecast at this time.</li>
<li>Video will be responsible for the majority of the traffic growth between 2009 and 2014.</li>
<li>Overall mobile data traffic is expected to grow to 3.6 exabytes per month by 2014, and over 2.3 of those are due to mobile video traffic.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>ComScore Shows There&#8217;s Lots of Room for Video Sites</strong>: Yes, <a href="http://bit.ly/akTkdJ">YouTube</a> gets the majority of the traffic at 26% of time spent, but the next 24 spots only add an additional 22% according to a recent report from ComScore. That leaves over half of all time spent &#8212; <a href="http://bit.ly/9HgILh">52% is in the tail</a>. If you use videos watched as the metric, the second company on that list is already into low single digits (<a href="http://bit.ly/9bA0Ao">Hulu at 3%</a>); and by the time you get to the 9th position on that list, you&#8217;re below single digits (CBS Interactive at .9%). So this story of video on the web is just beginning with lots of changes and growth to come. Great for .tv. Stay tuned.</p>
<p><strong>Half of NetFlix&#8217;s Customers Stream to their TV</strong>: <a href="http://bit.ly/bPy5fb">The Diffusion Group</a> issued a press release on a report they recently did which says 1/2 &#8211; yes that&#8217;s 50% &#8211; of their large base is using the &#8220;Watch Instantly&#8221; option on their TVs. No, this isn&#8217;t the lone college student streaming to their laptop (though they do have that demographic too). This refers to someone who bothered to buy a box to make it easy, or hack a way to get the stream from the Internet onto a TV (full disclosure, I&#8217;m one of the box variety). What does this say for the over the top option for video on the web in the near future?</p>
<p><img src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=newteevee.com&amp;blog=660143&amp;post=41719&amp;subd=newteevee&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" border="0" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/02/video-vignettes-for-the-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voila la Video</title>
		<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/voila-la-video/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/voila-la-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michaela B., VeriSign</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Streaming Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comscore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.watch.tv/?p=480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ComScore released a report this week that showed that online video consumption is up 36% in France while the number of videos grew 141%. It seems that the French have the  computer couch potato vibe down &#8211;  with 11.7 hours per viewer in France compared with 10.8 hours in the US.  Perhaps their lead [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ComScore released a <a href="http://bit.ly/8W8Ww8">report</a> this week that showed that online video consumption is up 36% in France while the number of videos grew 141%. It seems that the French have the  computer couch potato vibe down &#8211;  with 11.7 hours per viewer in France compared with 10.8 hours in the US.  Perhaps their lead in <a href="http://bit.ly/6pdQKO">IPTV</a> is showing up in these figures.</p>
<p>Google ranks first in both countries, but the 2nd through 4th, and 8th through 10th spots in France are sites not even on the US list. Facebook, Fox and Microsoft round out both lists.</p>
<p>To quote Delphine Gatignol, ComScore business development manager in France &#8220;The online video market in France has rapidly expanded during the past year as Internet users demonstrate their preference for the sight, sound and motion of video for consuming online content.&#8221; Seems an interest in video is global.</p>
<p>P.S.: If I got the gender of video wrong in my title, my apologies to the French speaking world. My high school French is a little rusty and not very current. I asked one of our lawyers who happened to be in from Switzerland for meetings this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/voila-la-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>