<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Watch.tv Blog &#187; FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.watch.tv/tag/fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.watch.tv</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Past Future of Television</title>
		<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/02/the-past-future-of-television/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/02/the-past-future-of-television/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michaela B., Verisign</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[televison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[william faulkner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.watch.tv/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The past is never dead. It&#8217;s not even past.&#8221; From Requiem for a Nun by William Faulkner Though it’s just beginning, I suspect this blog will be more about the future than it will be about the past. However, when I saw this posting on my friend’s Facebook page (thanks Mike). I thought there were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><em>&#8220;The past is never dead. It&#8217;s not even past.&#8221; </em><br />
From <em>Requiem for a Nun</em> by William Faulkner</p>
<p>Though it’s just beginning, I suspect this blog will be more about the future than it will be about the past. However, when I saw this posting on my friend’s Facebook page (thanks Mike). I thought there were some interesting similarities to today’s pontifications and ponderings. <a id="l36_" title="This site, from the American Historical Association" href="http://bit.ly/1Ss35Y">This site from the American Historical Association</a> has snippets of what people debated about television in the 1940s.</p>
<ul>
<li>It talks about movie studios being fearful of putting their good movies on TV, as people might stop going to movie theaters (substitute TV, for online, and how much different is the question now)?</li>
<li>There’s a whole section on the FCC and spectrum. We might have <em>finally</em> given up the ghost on that one after 60 years with the switch to digital; but the debate still continues if you count wireless broadband in the mix to get video via the Internet;</li>
<li>There’s a whole debate on standards; do we have the right ones to go forward (OK, in 1945 it might not have been Blu-ray verses HD-DVD, or <a href="http://bit.ly/9mtN91">HTML5</a>…but you get the picture…pun intended); and</li>
<li>There’s a section about advertising’s place in the new medium and what role subscriptions play (free verses paid is NOT a new dilemma).</li>
</ul>
<p>So, in summary, everything old is new again. In the next 60 years (yikes…that’s 2070) how will our grandchildren look back at our debates and discussions about video in the dawn of the 21st century? And, how much will be a slight twist of today’s debates.</p>
<div id="attachment_316" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_virginia/2899333734/"><img class="size-full wp-image-316" src="http://blog.watch.tv/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Black-and-white-TVs-bigger.jpg" alt="Black and white TVs bigger" width="500" height="365" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo via Library of Virginia: http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_virginia/</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/02/the-past-future-of-television/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Poised To Make Getting Videos To Your TV Easier?</title>
		<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/fcc-poised-to-make-getting-videos-to-your-tv-easier/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/fcc-poised-to-make-getting-videos-to-your-tv-easier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michaela B., Verisign</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle and Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.watch.tv/?p=498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Comcast/NBC Universal merger is getting much of the attention these days in the press and at the FCC. However, the New York Times had a piece today on an FCC request for comments (PDF) that is getting significantly less press play, but might be almost as impactful some day.  To quote the Times &#8220;Specifically, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Comcast/NBC Universal merger is getting much of the attention these days in the press and at the FCC. However, the <a href="http://bit.ly/69nhp2">New York Times</a> had a piece today on an <a href="http://bit.ly/6bPyLx">FCC request for comments</a> (PDF) that is getting significantly less press play, but might be almost as impactful some day.  </p>
<p>To quote the Times <em>&#8220;Specifically, the commission wants to make it much easier for anyone who makes a video program to send it directly to your television set, without having to cut a deal with a cable company.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>The wheels of government move slowly, but they can make sweeping changes that create whole industries. </p>
<p>Another one time obscure ruling that changed communications history also started at the FCC and involved hardware attached a communication system<a href="http://bit.ly/4NrDEm">&#8230;the Carterfone decision</a>.</p>
<p>So, the video landscape is changing and blurring&#8230;but the FCC might just be trying to push that along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/fcc-poised-to-make-getting-videos-to-your-tv-easier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

