<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Watch.tv Blog &#187; Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.watch.tv/tag/television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.watch.tv</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Cutting-edge TV&#8221; found on .tv</title>
		<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/cutting-edge-tv-found-on-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/cutting-edge-tv-found-on-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom C., Verisign</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.tv News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compulsions.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easytoassemble.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.watch.tv/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a great article in this Sunday&#8217;s Washington Post Arts &#38; Style section entitled &#8220;Cutting-edge TV? It&#8217;s not on cable.&#8221; The article talks about how online video continues to grow into longer, more engaging, higher-quality shows. It also highlights some of the relative merits of creating an online show, like the ability to be more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a great <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/15/AR2010041506083.html" target="_blank">article</a> in this Sunday&#8217;s Washington Post Arts &amp; Style section entitled &#8220;Cutting-edge TV? It&#8217;s not on cable.&#8221; The article talks about how online video continues to grow into longer, more engaging, higher-quality shows. It also highlights some of the relative merits of creating an online show, like the ability to be more topical or more niche than traditional television. I read these types of articles because I follow activity in the online video space, and I truly enjoy the ones that showcase new or unique content. This article is great because it lists 9 great web shows and their concepts, but the really fantastic part is that the top two shows are .tv sites!</p>
<p>The first show is called EasytoAssemble.tv and stars Illeana Douglas and Justine Bateman (you may remember Bateman from the 80&#8242;s sitcom &#8220;Family Ties&#8221;) as out of work actors who get jobs at Ikea.  I&#8217;d recommend skipping the pilot and going right into the first show &#8211; overall, the series has sort of a &#8220;Curb your Enthusiasm&#8221; vibe.</p>
<p>The second show is called Compulsions.tv &#8211; this one is similar to Showtime&#8217;s &#8220;Dexter&#8221;, but in my personal opinion much better. I watched the first episode of Dexter when it was first aired, and it failed to do in 60 minutes what Compulsions.tv did in 5 minutes &#8211; grab my interest.</p>
<p>Check out the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2010/04/16/GR2010041602123.html">full list</a>, and maybe you&#8217;ll discover a new favorite show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.watch.tv/2010/04/cutting-edge-tv-found-on-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Vignettes Roundup: December 18</title>
		<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/video-vingettes-for-the-week/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/video-vingettes-for-the-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michaela B., Verisign</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.tv News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blip.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Everywhere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.watch.tv/?p=637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes it&#8217;s Friday again, and there&#8217;s still a bunch of open tabs in the browser and unread stories in the feedreader. Here&#8217;s a quick list of video stories from the week that might be of interest: Comcast Rolls Out TV Everywhere: Well not everywhere yet (not all Comcast subscribers have access yet), but it&#8217;s a start.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it&#8217;s Friday again, and there&#8217;s still a bunch of open tabs in the browser and unread stories in the feedreader. Here&#8217;s a quick list of video stories from the week that might be of interest:</p>
<p><strong>Comcast Rolls Out TV Everywhere:</strong> Well not <a href="http://bit.ly/62lSPi">everywhere yet</a> (not all Comcast subscribers have access yet), but it&#8217;s a start.  Some of the reviews I saw said it was slow still and there are many <a href="http://bit.ly/5uhwwo">naysayers</a> for the concept. Plus, one might wonder if it&#8217;s more a move to slow the video equivalent of cord cutters verses a real service to customers. That said, it&#8217;s still an interesting move by a big player to the three screen video world everyone has talked about for years now.</p>
<p><strong>Video and Shoes</strong>: I promise, I&#8217;ll <a href="http://bit.ly/6ZYOXo">stop talking about this one, </a>but I saw some actual statistics from Zappos: they sell <a href="http://bit.ly/8nhJxZ">6% to 30% more merchandise</a> when accompanied by video. Wow!</p>
<p><strong>Streamy Awards:</strong> <a href="http://bit.ly/5lX9Zk">Submissions </a>opened this week. And, the International Academy of Web Television, that puts on the awards,  named Blip.tv co-founder Dina Kaplan Vice Chair.</p>
<p><strong>Santa Gets in the .tv Mood</strong>: For those wanting to send a special someone on their list a video from Santa, try out <a href="http://bit.ly/61n1KK">www.PortableNorthPole.tv</a>. Thanks to my Facebook friends for pointing this out.<a href="http://http://bit.ly/61n1KK"> </a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://bit.ly/61n1KK"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-663" title="NorthpoleTV" src="http://blog.watch.tv/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/NorthpoleTV-300x191.jpg" alt="NorthpoleTV" width="300" height="191" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/video-vingettes-for-the-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Poised To Make Getting Videos To Your TV Easier?</title>
		<link>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/fcc-poised-to-make-getting-videos-to-your-tv-easier/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/fcc-poised-to-make-getting-videos-to-your-tv-easier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michaela B., Verisign</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle and Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.watch.tv/?p=498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Comcast/NBC Universal merger is getting much of the attention these days in the press and at the FCC. However, the New York Times had a piece today on an FCC request for comments (PDF) that is getting significantly less press play, but might be almost as impactful some day.  To quote the Times &#8220;Specifically, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Comcast/NBC Universal merger is getting much of the attention these days in the press and at the FCC. However, the <a href="http://bit.ly/69nhp2">New York Times</a> had a piece today on an <a href="http://bit.ly/6bPyLx">FCC request for comments</a> (PDF) that is getting significantly less press play, but might be almost as impactful some day.  </p>
<p>To quote the Times <em>&#8220;Specifically, the commission wants to make it much easier for anyone who makes a video program to send it directly to your television set, without having to cut a deal with a cable company.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>The wheels of government move slowly, but they can make sweeping changes that create whole industries. </p>
<p>Another one time obscure ruling that changed communications history also started at the FCC and involved hardware attached a communication system<a href="http://bit.ly/4NrDEm">&#8230;the Carterfone decision</a>.</p>
<p>So, the video landscape is changing and blurring&#8230;but the FCC might just be trying to push that along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.watch.tv/2009/12/fcc-poised-to-make-getting-videos-to-your-tv-easier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

